Computer Misuse Act: Why Ugandans must use Blockchain-based Social Media Platforms

The state of internet freedom in Uganda is considered to be very limited. According to the 2020 Freedom on the Net report, the government has increased its censorship of the internet and restricted access to certain websites and social media platforms, including Facebook and Twitter, in order to stifle the spread of dissent. The government also has a history of blocking or slowing down internet connections during protests, or other events it deems politically sensitive. Additionally, authorities have instituted a social media tax, which is seen as a way to limit access to online platforms, as well as to generate revenue.

Other African countries that are facing limitations on internet freedom include Ethiopia, Sudan, and Egypt. In Ethiopia, the government has imposed restrictions on access to certain websites and social media platforms, while in Sudan, the government has shut down the internet entirely during times of political unrest. In Egypt, the government has blocked access to websites deemed to be critical of the government, as well as social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. Additionally, authorities have also instituted a social media tax, which is seen as a way to limit access to online platforms, as well as to generate revenue.

Other African countries have implemented a range of laws and regulations to limit internet freedom. For example, in Ethiopia, the government has imposed restrictions on access to certain websites and social media platforms through the Use of Telecommunications Law of 2008, as well as the Press Proclamation of 2002. In Sudan, the Telecommunications Act of 2013 has been used to restrict access to the internet, while in Egypt, the Anti-Cyber and Information Technology Crimes Law of 2018 has been used to censor websites deemed to be critical of the government. Additionally, other countries have instituted social media taxes, which are seen as a way to limit access to online platforms, as well as to generate revenue.

The Computer Misuse Act of 2011 is one of the main laws that limit internet freedom in Uganda. It criminalizes deliberate unauthorized access to computers, networks, and digital content and carries potential prison sentences of up to three years. The Electronic Transaction Act of 2016 also restricts internet freedom by criminalizing the production and circulation of false information, as well as the use of false identities online. Additionally, the Uganda Communications Act of 2013, which regulates the telecommunications sector, has been used by the government to restrict access to certain websites and social media platforms and to restrict the circulation of certain content.

Section 25 of the Computer Misuse Act of 2011 has been declared null and void. This section previously criminalizes the deliberate unauthorized access to computers, networks, and digital content and carries potential prison sentences of up to three years. The declaration of section 25 as null and void would likely make a significant contribution to internet freedom in Uganda. Section 25 is used by the government to limit access to certain websites and social media platforms, and to restrict the circulation of certain content. By removing this section, the government would be unable to selectively use the law to restrict internet freedom. 

Ugandans should consider using blockchain based social media platforms because they offer more privacy and security than traditional platforms. Blockchain technology is decentralized, meaning that no single entity controls the data. This means that all data is more secure, and no one can censor, manipulate, or delete it. Additionally, blockchain based platforms are also more resistant to censorship than traditional platforms, so users can be sure that their posts and conversations are safe from government interference. Finally, blockchain based platforms are also more transparent, meaning that users can easily track the source of any posts or messages.

The increased use of blockchain-based social media could potentially positively impact internet freedom in Uganda. Blockchain technology offers a more secure platform for communication, as it uses a distributed ledger to store and transmits data, making it more difficult for unauthorized third parties to access. This could give citizens the ability to communicate without fear of censorship or surveillance. Additionally, blockchain-based social media platforms would be more difficult for the government to block or restrict, thus giving citizens greater freedom to access the information they need.

Ugandans may consider using the following ten blockchain-based social media platforms for internet freedom: Mastodon, Minds, Steemit, WADA Community Portal, DTube, Synereo, Akasha, Bitnation, and Yours. These platforms offer more secure communication, with built-in encryption and distributed ledger technology making it difficult for unauthorized third parties to access or modify data. Additionally, these platforms are generally more difficult for the government to block or restrict, giving citizens greater freedom to access the information they need. These platforms can be used anywhere in Africa where there is limitation on internet freedom.

Governments in Africa that are limiting internet freedom should focus on protecting the rights of citizens to access information and express themselves freely online, rather than restricting access for political gain. Governments should remove laws and regulations that are used to censor or restrict access to certain websites and social media platforms, and should refrain from instituting any new taxes or fees that would limit access to online platforms. Additionally, governments should ensure that any laws or regulations related to internet freedom are in line with international standards of freedom of expression, and should not be used to target political dissidents or to stifle dissent.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top